Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research, ISSN - 0973 - 709X

Users Online : 23912

AbstractCase ReportDiscussionConclusionReferencesDOI and Others
Article in PDF How to Cite Citation Manager Readers' Comments (0) Audio Visual Article Statistics Link to PUBMED Print this Article Send to a Friend
Advertisers Access Statistics Resources

Dr Mohan Z Mani

"Thank you very much for having published my article in record time.I would like to compliment you and your entire staff for your promptness, courtesy, and willingness to be customer friendly, which is quite unusual.I was given your reference by a colleague in pathology,and was able to directly phone your editorial office for clarifications.I would particularly like to thank the publication managers and the Assistant Editor who were following up my article. I would also like to thank you for adjusting the money I paid initially into payment for my modified article,and refunding the balance.
I wish all success to your journal and look forward to sending you any suitable similar article in future"



Dr Mohan Z Mani,
Professor & Head,
Department of Dermatolgy,
Believers Church Medical College,
Thiruvalla, Kerala
On Sep 2018




Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar

"Over the last few years, we have published our research regularly in Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research. Having published in more than 20 high impact journals over the last five years including several high impact ones and reviewing articles for even more journals across my fields of interest, we value our published work in JCDR for their high standards in publishing scientific articles. The ease of submission, the rapid reviews in under a month, the high quality of their reviewers and keen attention to the final process of proofs and publication, ensure that there are no mistakes in the final article. We have been asked clarifications on several occasions and have been happy to provide them and it exemplifies the commitment to quality of the team at JCDR."



Prof. Somashekhar Nimbalkar
Head, Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad
Chairman, Research Group, Charutar Arogya Mandal, Karamsad
National Joint Coordinator - Advanced IAP NNF NRP Program
Ex-Member, Governing Body, National Neonatology Forum, New Delhi
Ex-President - National Neonatology Forum Gujarat State Chapter
Department of Pediatrics, Pramukhswami Medical College, Karamsad, Anand, Gujarat.
On Sep 2018




Dr. Kalyani R

"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research is at present a well-known Indian originated scientific journal which started with a humble beginning. I have been associated with this journal since many years. I appreciate the Editor, Dr. Hemant Jain, for his constant effort in bringing up this journal to the present status right from the scratch. The journal is multidisciplinary. It encourages in publishing the scientific articles from postgraduates and also the beginners who start their career. At the same time the journal also caters for the high quality articles from specialty and super-specialty researchers. Hence it provides a platform for the scientist and researchers to publish. The other aspect of it is, the readers get the information regarding the most recent developments in science which can be used for teaching, research, treating patients and to some extent take preventive measures against certain diseases. The journal is contributing immensely to the society at national and international level."



Dr Kalyani R
Professor and Head
Department of Pathology
Sri Devaraj Urs Medical College
Sri Devaraj Urs Academy of Higher Education and Research , Kolar, Karnataka
On Sep 2018




Dr. Saumya Navit

"As a peer-reviewed journal, the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research provides an opportunity to researchers, scientists and budding professionals to explore the developments in the field of medicine and dentistry and their varied specialities, thus extending our view on biological diversities of living species in relation to medicine.
‘Knowledge is treasure of a wise man.’ The free access of this journal provides an immense scope of learning for the both the old and the young in field of medicine and dentistry as well. The multidisciplinary nature of the journal makes it a better platform to absorb all that is being researched and developed. The publication process is systematic and professional. Online submission, publication and peer reviewing makes it a user-friendly journal.
As an experienced dentist and an academician, I proudly recommend this journal to the dental fraternity as a good quality open access platform for rapid communication of their cutting-edge research progress and discovery.
I wish JCDR a great success and I hope that journal will soar higher with the passing time."



Dr Saumya Navit
Professor and Head
Department of Pediatric Dentistry
Saraswati Dental College
Lucknow
On Sep 2018




Dr. Arunava Biswas

"My sincere attachment with JCDR as an author as well as reviewer is a learning experience . Their systematic approach in publication of article in various categories is really praiseworthy.
Their prompt and timely response to review's query and the manner in which they have set the reviewing process helps in extracting the best possible scientific writings for publication.
It's a honour and pride to be a part of the JCDR team. My very best wishes to JCDR and hope it will sparkle up above the sky as a high indexed journal in near future."



Dr. Arunava Biswas
MD, DM (Clinical Pharmacology)
Assistant Professor
Department of Pharmacology
Calcutta National Medical College & Hospital , Kolkata




Dr. C.S. Ramesh Babu
" Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a multi-specialty medical and dental journal publishing high quality research articles in almost all branches of medicine. The quality of printing of figures and tables is excellent and comparable to any International journal. An added advantage is nominal publication charges and monthly issue of the journal and more chances of an article being accepted for publication. Moreover being a multi-specialty journal an article concerning a particular specialty has a wider reach of readers of other related specialties also. As an author and reviewer for several years I find this Journal most suitable and highly recommend this Journal."
Best regards,
C.S. Ramesh Babu,
Associate Professor of Anatomy,
Muzaffarnagar Medical College,
Muzaffarnagar.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Arundhathi. S
"Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR) is a reputed peer reviewed journal and is constantly involved in publishing high quality research articles related to medicine. Its been a great pleasure to be associated with this esteemed journal as a reviewer and as an author for a couple of years. The editorial board consists of many dedicated and reputed experts as its members and they are doing an appreciable work in guiding budding researchers. JCDR is doing a commendable job in scientific research by promoting excellent quality research & review articles and case reports & series. The reviewers provide appropriate suggestions that improve the quality of articles. I strongly recommend my fraternity to encourage JCDR by contributing their valuable research work in this widely accepted, user friendly journal. I hope my collaboration with JCDR will continue for a long time".



Dr. Arundhathi. S
MBBS, MD (Pathology),
Sanjay Gandhi institute of trauma and orthopedics,
Bengaluru.
On Aug 2018




Dr. Mamta Gupta,
"It gives me great pleasure to be associated with JCDR, since last 2-3 years. Since then I have authored, co-authored and reviewed about 25 articles in JCDR. I thank JCDR for giving me an opportunity to improve my own skills as an author and a reviewer.
It 's a multispecialty journal, publishing high quality articles. It gives a platform to the authors to publish their research work which can be available for everyone across the globe to read. The best thing about JCDR is that the full articles of all medical specialties are available as pdf/html for reading free of cost or without institutional subscription, which is not there for other journals. For those who have problem in writing manuscript or do statistical work, JCDR comes for their rescue.
The journal has a monthly publication and the articles are published quite fast. In time compared to other journals. The on-line first publication is also a great advantage and facility to review one's own articles before going to print. The response to any query and permission if required, is quite fast; this is quite commendable. I have a very good experience about seeking quick permission for quoting a photograph (Fig.) from a JCDR article for my chapter authored in an E book. I never thought it would be so easy. No hassles.
Reviewing articles is no less a pain staking process and requires in depth perception, knowledge about the topic for review. It requires time and concentration, yet I enjoy doing it. The JCDR website especially for the reviewers is quite user friendly. My suggestions for improving the journal is, more strict review process, so that only high quality articles are published. I find a a good number of articles in Obst. Gynae, hence, a new journal for this specialty titled JCDR-OG can be started. May be a bimonthly or quarterly publication to begin with. Only selected articles should find a place in it.
An yearly reward for the best article authored can also incentivize the authors. Though the process of finding the best article will be not be very easy. I do not know how reviewing process can be improved. If an article is being reviewed by two reviewers, then opinion of one can be communicated to the other or the final opinion of the editor can be communicated to the reviewer if requested for. This will help one’s reviewing skills.
My best wishes to Dr. Hemant Jain and all the editorial staff of JCDR for their untiring efforts to bring out this journal. I strongly recommend medical fraternity to publish their valuable research work in this esteemed journal, JCDR".



Dr. Mamta Gupta
Consultant
(Ex HOD Obs &Gynae, Hindu Rao Hospital and associated NDMC Medical College, Delhi)
Aug 2018




Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey

"I wish to thank Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), for asking me to write up few words.
Writing is the representation of language in a textual medium i e; into the words and sentences on paper. Quality medical manuscript writing in particular, demands not only a high-quality research, but also requires accurate and concise communication of findings and conclusions, with adherence to particular journal guidelines. In medical field whether working in teaching, private, or in corporate institution, everyone wants to excel in his / her own field and get recognised by making manuscripts publication.


Authors are the souls of any journal, and deserve much respect. To publish a journal manuscripts are needed from authors. Authors have a great responsibility for producing facts of their work in terms of number and results truthfully and an individual honesty is expected from authors in this regards. Both ways its true "No authors-No manuscripts-No journals" and "No journals–No manuscripts–No authors". Reviewing a manuscript is also a very responsible and important task of any peer-reviewed journal and to be taken seriously. It needs knowledge on the subject, sincerity, honesty and determination. Although the process of reviewing a manuscript is a time consuming task butit is expected to give one's best remarks within the time frame of the journal.
Salient features of the JCDR: It is a biomedical, multidisciplinary (including all medical and dental specialities), e-journal, with wide scope and extensive author support. At the same time, a free text of manuscript is available in HTML and PDF format. There is fast growing authorship and readership with JCDR as this can be judged by the number of articles published in it i e; in Feb 2007 of its first issue, it contained 5 articles only, and now in its recent volume published in April 2011, it contained 67 manuscripts. This e-journal is fulfilling the commitments and objectives sincerely, (as stated by Editor-in-chief in his preface to first edition) i e; to encourage physicians through the internet, especially from the developing countries who witness a spectrum of disease and acquire a wealth of knowledge to publish their experiences to benefit the medical community in patients care. I also feel that many of us have work of substance, newer ideas, adequate clinical materials but poor in medical writing and hesitation to submit the work and need help. JCDR provides authors help in this regards.
Timely publication of journal: Publication of manuscripts and bringing out the issue in time is one of the positive aspects of JCDR and is possible with strong support team in terms of peer reviewers, proof reading, language check, computer operators, etc. This is one of the great reasons for authors to submit their work with JCDR. Another best part of JCDR is "Online first Publications" facilities available for the authors. This facility not only provides the prompt publications of the manuscripts but at the same time also early availability of the manuscripts for the readers.
Indexation and online availability: Indexation transforms the journal in some sense from its local ownership to the worldwide professional community and to the public.JCDR is indexed with Embase & EMbiology, Google Scholar, Index Copernicus, Chemical Abstracts Service, Journal seek Database, Indian Science Abstracts, to name few of them. Manuscriptspublished in JCDR are available on major search engines ie; google, yahoo, msn.
In the era of fast growing newer technologies, and in computer and internet friendly environment the manuscripts preparation, submission, review, revision, etc and all can be done and checked with a click from all corer of the world, at any time. Of course there is always a scope for improvement in every field and none is perfect. To progress, one needs to identify the areas of one's weakness and to strengthen them.
It is well said that "happy beginning is half done" and it fits perfectly with JCDR. It has grown considerably and I feel it has already grown up from its infancy to adolescence, achieving the status of standard online e-journal form Indian continent since its inception in Feb 2007. This had been made possible due to the efforts and the hard work put in it. The way the JCDR is improving with every new volume, with good quality original manuscripts, makes it a quality journal for readers. I must thank and congratulate Dr Hemant Jain, Editor-in-Chief JCDR and his team for their sincere efforts, dedication, and determination for making JCDR a fast growing journal.
Every one of us: authors, reviewers, editors, and publisher are responsible for enhancing the stature of the journal. I wish for a great success for JCDR."



Thanking you
With sincere regards
Dr. Rajendra Kumar Ghritlaharey, M.S., M. Ch., FAIS
Associate Professor,
Department of Paediatric Surgery, Gandhi Medical College & Associated
Kamla Nehru & Hamidia Hospitals Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh 462 001 (India)
E-mail: drrajendrak1@rediffmail.com
On May 11,2011




Dr. Shankar P.R.

"On looking back through my Gmail archives after being requested by the journal to write a short editorial about my experiences of publishing with the Journal of Clinical and Diagnostic Research (JCDR), I came across an e-mail from Dr. Hemant Jain, Editor, in March 2007, which introduced the new electronic journal. The main features of the journal which were outlined in the e-mail were extensive author support, cash rewards, the peer review process, and other salient features of the journal.
Over a span of over four years, we (I and my colleagues) have published around 25 articles in the journal. In this editorial, I plan to briefly discuss my experiences of publishing with JCDR and the strengths of the journal and to finally address the areas for improvement.
My experiences of publishing with JCDR: Overall, my experiences of publishing withJCDR have been positive. The best point about the journal is that it responds to queries from the author. This may seem to be simple and not too much to ask for, but unfortunately, many journals in the subcontinent and from many developing countries do not respond or they respond with a long delay to the queries from the authors 1. The reasons could be many, including lack of optimal secretarial and other support. Another problem with many journals is the slowness of the review process. Editorial processing and peer review can take anywhere between a year to two years with some journals. Also, some journals do not keep the contributors informed about the progress of the review process. Due to the long review process, the articles can lose their relevance and topicality. A major benefit with JCDR is the timeliness and promptness of its response. In Dr Jain's e-mail which was sent to me in 2007, before the introduction of the Pre-publishing system, he had stated that he had received my submission and that he would get back to me within seven days and he did!
Most of the manuscripts are published within 3 to 4 months of their submission if they are found to be suitable after the review process. JCDR is published bimonthly and the accepted articles were usually published in the next issue. Recently, due to the increased volume of the submissions, the review process has become slower and it ?? Section can take from 4 to 6 months for the articles to be reviewed. The journal has an extensive author support system and it has recently introduced a paid expedited review process. The journal also mentions the average time for processing the manuscript under different submission systems - regular submission and expedited review.
Strengths of the journal: The journal has an online first facility in which the accepted manuscripts may be published on the website before being included in a regular issue of the journal. This cuts down the time between their acceptance and the publication. The journal is indexed in many databases, though not in PubMed. The editorial board should now take steps to index the journal in PubMed. The journal has a system of notifying readers through e-mail when a new issue is released. Also, the articles are available in both the HTML and the PDF formats. I especially like the new and colorful page format of the journal. Also, the access statistics of the articles are available. The prepublication and the manuscript tracking system are also helpful for the authors.
Areas for improvement: In certain cases, I felt that the peer review process of the manuscripts was not up to international standards and that it should be strengthened. Also, the number of manuscripts in an issue is high and it may be difficult for readers to go through all of them. The journal can consider tightening of the peer review process and increasing the quality standards for the acceptance of the manuscripts. I faced occasional problems with the online manuscript submission (Pre-publishing) system, which have to be addressed.
Overall, the publishing process with JCDR has been smooth, quick and relatively hassle free and I can recommend other authors to consider the journal as an outlet for their work."



Dr. P. Ravi Shankar
KIST Medical College, P.O. Box 14142, Kathmandu, Nepal.
E-mail: ravi.dr.shankar@gmail.com
On April 2011
Anuradha

Dear team JCDR, I would like to thank you for the very professional and polite service provided by everyone at JCDR. While i have been in the field of writing and editing for sometime, this has been my first attempt in publishing a scientific paper.Thank you for hand-holding me through the process.


Dr. Anuradha
E-mail: anuradha2nittur@gmail.com
On Jan 2020

Important Notice

Case Series
Year : 2024 | Month : February | Volume : 18 | Issue : 2 | Page : RR01 - RR03 Full Version

Spinal Tuberculosis in Pregnancy: A Case Series


Published: February 1, 2024 | DOI: https://doi.org/10.7860/JCDR/2024/65512.19029
Swaramya Chnadrasekaran, Karthick Anand Krishnamurthy, Balaji Kalimuthu

1. Assistant Professor, Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Research Centre, Puducherry, India. 2. Associate Professor, Department of Orthopaedics, Sri Venkateshwaraa Medical College and Research Centre, Puducherry, India. 3. Associate Professor, Department of Pulmonology, Arupadaiveedu Medical College, Puducherry, India.

Correspondence Address :
Karthickanand Krishnamurthy,
73, Montorsier Street, Puducherry-605001, India.
E-mail: karthick13985@gmail.com

Abstract

Spinal Tuberculosis (Pott’s Spine) infection during pregnancy poses significant challenges in early diagnosis, as it often resembles typical back pain experienced during pregnancy. Delayed diagnosis has resulted in maternal and foetal complications, including paraplegia, premature labor, preterm delivery, and foetal growth restriction. Treatment approaches are tailored to individual clinical presentations and may involve conservative or surgical intervention. Surgical decompression should be considered when there is a neurological deficit that could complicate the delivery process. The standard Antituberculous Therapy (ATT) regimen for 12 months is an accepted treatment protocol according to the World Health Organisation (WHO) guidelines during the antenatal period. The present case series comprises four middle-aged pregnant women (two aged 19 years, one aged 21 years, and one aged 35 years, all primigravida) diagnosed with Pott’s spine at various trimesters, exhibiting a range of clinical presentations from mild back pain to acute neurological deficits. One patient in the late trimester with a neurological deficit required surgical decompression, while the remaining patients were successfully managed with appropriate ATT.

Keywords

Antituberculous therapy, Paraplegia, Pott’s spine

Extrapulmonary Tuberculosis (TB) occurs in 10% of the population, with Pott’s spine (TB spine) accounting for 2% of the cases (1). TB spine in pregnancy can go undiagnosed for a long period until patients present with complications like neurological deficit (1). The clinical presentation varies from simple vague back pain to the development of deformity and neurological deficit in advanced stages (2). It poses an added risk to both the mother and foetus. Diagnosis is purely based on clinical suspicion, with Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) being the investigation of choice, and tissue diagnosis is necessary to detect TB and resistance to rifampicin (3). Surgical management in patients presenting with paraplegia has yielded good results (2),(4). Drugs in the standard ATT belong to category C and are accepted in the treatment protocol for TB in pregnancy (5). The present case series of pregnant females with TB at various periods of gestation and their management.

Case Report

Case 1

A 19-year-old primigravida female patient at 36 weeks and two days gestation presented to the Emergency Department with severe lower back pain and progressive weakness in both lower limbs. She was unable to walk upon presentation, and there was no bowel or bladder dysfunction. The patient had no significant past medical history. Upon examination, motor power in both lower limbs below L3 was quantified as 3/5 (MRC grade) (5). Sensations were intact. Abdominal ultrasound revealed a psoas abscess and a live intrauterine foetus appropriate for the gestational age. X-ray and plain MRI of the patient’s spine showed infective spondylodiscitis at the L3-L4 level, causing compression of the spinal cord [Table/Fig-1a-d]. An emergency caesarean section was performed, and a healthy baby was delivered. Three days after the caesarean delivery, the patient underwent posterior decompression, debridement, and fusion of the affected spine segments. The sample sent for Cartridge-based Nucleic Acid Amplification Test (CBNAAT) indicated the presence of mycobacterium tuberculosis that was not resistant to rifampicin. Pyogenic culture did not show any growth. A final diagnosis of TB spine with paraplegia was made, and the patient was initiated on a weight-adjusted dosage of the two-month intensive phase of Antituberculous Therapy (ATT) (Rifampicin, Isoniazid, Pyrazinamide, Ethambutol), followed by a seven-month continuation phase of rifampicin and isoniazid. Treatment was discontinued based on clinical improvement, laboratory values, and radiological healing. The patient regained power in her lower limbs two weeks postsurgery and was able to walk independently. During the final follow-up after completiong the ATT course, the X-ray showed a healed spine (Table/Fig 1)a-d, and the patient was free from pain with no limitations in performing activities of daily living. She and her child have been under constant follow-up for the past three years.

Case 2

A 19-year-old primigravida female patient in her first trimester was referred to the Orthopaedics Department with a history of mid-back pain for five weeks and bilateral leg pain. She was unable to sit without support, and the pain was affecting her daily activities. The patient had no significant past medical history. Upon examination, there was spinal tenderness at the D7-D8 level, along with a mild gibbus at D7, but no neurological deficit was observed. MRI findings were suggestive of D7-D8 infective spondylodiscitis with a paraspinal abscess (Table/Fig 2)a,b. The patient underwent a biopsy under fluoroscopic guidance, with a low dose of radiation and a lead shield for the abdomen. CBNAAT testing of the sample confirmed the presence of Mycobacterium tuberculosis, which was sensitive to rifampicin. A final diagnosis of TB spine with no neurological deficit was established. The patient completed a nine-month course of Antituberculous Therapy (ATT) with monthly follow-ups to monitor the progression of her pregnancy. She delivered a healthy baby at 37 weeks. Following the completion of ATT, she was clinically normal, and the MRI showed adequate healing of the vertebrae and resolution of the abscess.

Case 3

A 21-year-old primigravida female patient in her 2nd trimester presented to the Orthopaedics Department with low back pain that was affecting her daily activities for the past four weeks. Her past medical history was negative for any contact with a TB patient. Upon examination, tenderness was observed at the L4-L5 vertebrae, but there was no neurological deficit. MRI findings were suggestive of infective spondylodiscitis at the L4-L5 level (Table/Fig 3). The patient underwent blood investigations for the infection, including a complete blood count, Erythrocyte Sedimentation Rate (ESR), C-reactive Protein (CRP), and blood culture. Her pyogenic infection profile tests came back negative. However, the sample was sent for CBNAAT, which yielded a positive result for TB. A working diagnosis of TB spine was made, and it was decided to empirically treat the patient with a weight-adjusted dosage of Antituberculous therapy for a total of nine months, based on clinical and radiological findings. The patient showed symptomatic improvement, and she delivered a baby at 38 weeks spontaneously. The postnatal period was uneventful.

Case 4

A 35-year-old primigravida female patient at nine weeks of pregnancy presented with mid-back pain that had been persisting for the past four weeks. The pain had a gradual onset, was progressive, and was affecting her daily activities. Upon examination, tenderness was observed at the D8-D9 level, with no deformity or neurological deficits. The MRI findings indicated multifocal infective spondylodiscitis at the D9, D10, and D11 levels, along with a paravertebral abscess (Table/Fig 4)a,b. Additionally, minimal pleural effusion was noted. Ultrasound-guided aspiration of pleural tissue revealed caseating granulomatous inflammation suggestive of tuberculosis. The patient was initiated on a weight-adjusted dosage of Antituberculous Therapy (ATT) and continued the treatment for 10 months, following the World Health Organisation (WHO) protocol (2). Regular monthly antenatal check-ups were uneventful, and she delivered a healthy baby at term.

Discussion

The present case series discusses four cases of TB spine and their respective MRI presentations. TB spine often presents with back pain, which can lead to a delay in diagnosis as it may be mistaken for pyogenic spondylitis or malignancy. Diagnosing TB spine in pregnancy can be challenging and requires a high level of suspicion (6),(7),(8). Bothamley G et al., have discussed the factors contributing to the delay in diagnosing TB spine in pregnancy, and the authors of this study took these factors into consideration, resulting in a shorter time to initiate treatment (7). The delay in diagnosis is often due to the presentation of back pain, which is commonly associated with pregnancy. The average time from presentation to diagnosis in present study was two weeks, consistent with other published literature such as Orazulike N et al., and Wolf B et al., (9),(10),(11). A study by Shrivastava S et al., also reported foetal demise due to a delay in initiating ATT treatment in a pregnant patient in the second trimester (9),(10),(11).

Delayed diagnosis can lead to complications for both the mother and the growing foetus, as demonstrated by Sobhy S et al., in present case series. One patient presented with incomplete paraplegia, while the other patients did not experience any complications for both the mother and the foetus (2). MRI without contrast is sufficient for diagnosing TB spondylitis and is safe during pregnancy (3). Tissue diagnosis is necessary to confirm TB and assess its sensitivity to rifampicin, allowing for tailored ATT treatment (8). In this series, patients presented at various stages of pregnancy with different clinical symptoms. Antitubercular drugs, following WHO guidelines, are considered safe in such cases (4),(12). The WHO India guidelines for extra pulmonary TB recommend two months of intensive phase treatment and 10-16 months of continuation phase treatment (4). Decompression surgery should be considered in cases of gross instability with neurological deficits (13).

Successful surgical management has been reported in previous cases involving pregnant females with a gravid uterus, ensuring the safety of both the mother and the foetus (14),(15). In the present case series, patients showed immediate improvement after decompression of the spinal cord, enabling better postnatal care for the mother and baby. Similar cases have been reported by Badve SA et al., describing three cases of successful surgical decompression for spinal TB followed by delivery (14),(15),(16). Continuing ATT treatment during the postnatal period showed no adverse effects in breastfed babies.

Conclusion

Back pain during pregnancy should not always be considered a normal occurrence. As demonstrated in present case study, early detection and treatment of spinal TB can lead to a favourable prognosis for both the mother and child. Surgical decompression followed by ATT should be considered in cases of significant instability and neurological deficits. ATT remains the primary treatment for all cases and has been proven to be safe during pregnancy in present study.

References

1.
Dunn RN, Husien MB. Spinal tuberculosis: Review of current management. Bone Joint J. 2018;100(4):425-31. [crossref][PubMed]
2.
Sobhy S, Babiker ZO, Zamora J, Khan KS, Kunst H. Maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity associated with tuberculosis during pregnancy and the postpartum period: A systematic review and meta-analysis. BJOG. 2017;124(5):727-33. [crossref][PubMed]
3.
Lum M, Tsiouris AJ. MRI safety considerations during pregnancy. Clin Imaging. 2020;62:69-75. Doi: 10.1016/j.clinimag.2020.02.007. Epub 2020 Feb 20. [crossref][PubMed]
4.
WHO TB guidelines: Recent updates; https://www.who.int/publications/digital/ global-tuberculosis-report-2021/featured-topics/tbguidelines#:~:text=The%20 communication%20includes%20new%20information,treat%20drug-resistreat%20 drug-resistant%20TB%2C%20a.
5.
Medical Research Council; Aids to the examination of the peripheral nervous system. HMSO, London; 1976; https://www.ukri.org/wp-content/uploads/2021/12/MRC- 011221-AidsToTheExaminationOfThePeripheralNervousSystem.pdf.
6.
Lowenstein L, Ido S, Fischer D, Drugan A. Spinal tuberculosis with paraplegia in pregnancy. Isr Med Assoc J. 2004;6(7):436-37.
7.
Bothamley G. Drug treatment for tuberculosis during pregnancy: Safety considerations. Drug Saf. 2001;24(7):553-65. Doi: 10.2165/00002018-200124 070-00006. PMID: 11444726. [crossref][PubMed]
8.
Miele K, Morris SB, Tepper NK. Tuberculosis in pregnancy. Obstet Gynecol. 2020;135(6):1444-53. [crossref][PubMed]
9.
Orazulike N, Sharma JB, Sharma S, Umeora OU. Tuberculosis (TB) in pregnancy-A review. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2021;259:167-77. Doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2021.02.016. Epub 2021 Feb 19. [crossref][PubMed]
10.
Wolf B, Krasselt M, de Fallois J, von Braun A, Stepan H. Tuberculosis in pregnancy-a summary. Geburtshilfe Frauenheilkd. 2019;79(4):358-65. [crossref][PubMed]
11.
Srivastava S, Raj A, Agarwal R, Bhosale S, Marathe N. Management dilemma of tuberculous paraplegia in pregnancy-A case report and review of literature. Surg Neurol Int. 2020;29(11):470. Doi: 10.25259/SNI_772_2020. [crossref][PubMed]
12.
Loughenbury P, Pavlou G, Dunsmuir R. Surgical treatment of tuberculous paraparesis in the third trimester: A report of two cases and review of the literature. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2009;68(3):213-16. [crossref][PubMed]
13.
Behr MA, Edelstein PH, Ramakrishnan L. Revisiting the timetable of tuberculosis. BMJ. 2018;362:k2738. [crossref][PubMed]
14.
Kaul R, Chhabra HS, Kanagaraju V, Mahajan R, Tandon V, Nanda A, et al. Antepartum surgical management of Pott’s paraplegia along with maintenance of pregnancy during second trimester. European Spine Journal. 2016;25(4):1064-69. [crossref][PubMed]
15.
Singh H, Singh J, Abdullah BT, Matthews A. Tuberculous paraplegia in pregnancy treated by surgery. Singapore Medical Journal. 2002;43(5):251-53.
16.
Badve SA, Ghate SD, Badve MS, Rustagi T, Macchiwala T, Parekh AN, et al. Tuberculosis of spine with neurological deficit in advanced pregnancy: A report of three cases. The Spine Journal. 2011;11(1):e09-16.[crossref][PubMed]

DOI and Others

DOI: 10.7860/JCDR/2024/65512.19029

Date of Submission: May 28, 2023
Date of Peer Review: Jul 21, 2023
Date of Acceptance: Oct 14, 2023
Date of Publishing: Feb 01, 2024

AUTHOR DECLARATION:
• Financial or Other Competing Interests: None
• Was informed consent obtained from the subjects involved in the study? NA
• For any images presented appropriate consent has been obtained from the subjects. NA

PLAGIARISM CHECKING METHODS:
• Plagiarism X-checker: May 29, 2023
• Manual Googling: Sep 06, 2023
• iThenticate Software: Oct 11, 2023 (3%)

ETYMOLOGY: Author Origin

EMENDATIONS: 7

JCDR is now Monthly and more widely Indexed .
  • Emerging Sources Citation Index (Web of Science, thomsonreuters)
  • Index Copernicus ICV 2017: 134.54
  • Academic Search Complete Database
  • Directory of Open Access Journals (DOAJ)
  • Embase
  • EBSCOhost
  • Google Scholar
  • HINARI Access to Research in Health Programme
  • Indian Science Abstracts (ISA)
  • Journal seek Database
  • Google
  • Popline (reproductive health literature)
  • www.omnimedicalsearch.com